Subject	you sure you are not confusing 1/4 mile>>>>>
Posted by	my91z(5.0 Killer) on May 29, 2001 at 1:23 PM
	This message has been viewed 24 times.
In Reply To	Good thing you said almost always, in the Z32's posted by F8IZHIS on May 29, 2001 at 01:04 PM
Message	I think I read the auto is better for 1/4 mile becuase all you do is hold the gas on the floor(no skill involved), let computer shift and you get more consistant times than a 5spd. I am almost 100% positive a 5spd NA is faster than an auto. Mike Yeah, I know mine's an N/A! :-) AIM name: my91z MSN name: my91z
Follow Ups	how many second is Z to 0-60k.?? - seahoon 11:47:13 05/29/01 About Stage XII, ;-) (n/m) - 90Turbo(CA) 11:49:50 05/29/01 damn! now i know mine isnt that slow and i have a 90 NA auto - Grendelrt(VA) 11:58:56 05/29/01 other way around (n/m) - F8IZHIS 12:42:28 05/29/01 I don't think so>>>>>> - my91z(5.0 Killer) 12:45:17 05/29/01 Good thing you said almost always, in the Z32's - F8IZHIS 13:04:52 05/29/01 you sure you are not confusing 1/4 mile>>>>> - my91z(5.0 Killer) 13:23:21 05/29/01 Hmm, could be (n/m) - F8IZHIS 13:43:26 05/29/01 OK, I did a search, 5spds ARE faster than auto's>>> - my91z(5.0 Killer) 13:44:34 05/29/01 Only for Turbos. 5sp is faster for NA> - twinz 14:39:13 05/29/01 Get that car checked out my car can do that in the 1/4 mile! (n/m) - pornallstar 12:13:59 05/29/01 I guess 0-60K is alot different than 0-60MPH. (n/m) - Mimi(91TT) 12:16:48 05/29/01 0-60k should be around 5-6 years at normal annual mileage (n/m) - madman99 13:30:52 05/29/01 dude hes talking about acceleration time (n/m) - LedZep(93SilverNA) 19:32:37 05/29/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.